CANCER

Exercise as a treatment to improve prostate cancer morbidity and mortality

An exploration on the effect of exercise on prostate cancer morbidity and mortality

Dr Ray McDermott, Consultant Medical Oncologist, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Dr Grainne O'Kane, Registrar in Oncology, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ms Lauren Brady, PhD Candidate, Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, Trinity College, Dublin, Dr Tatjana Vlajnic, Pathologist, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, Ms Orla Casey, Translational Research Co-Ordinator, All Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ms Emer Guinan, Research Fellow, Discipline of Physiotherapy, Trinity College, Dublin, Dr Brian Hayes, Consultant Pathologist, Department of HIstopathology, Cork University Hospital and Prof John O'Leary, Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, St James Hospital, Dublin

May 11, 2016

Article
Similar articles
  • Exercise is emerging as a successful non-pharmacological treatment to achieve significant improvements in prostate cancer (PCa) morbidity and mortality. A landmark paper in this area reported that men with PCa who exercised vigorously (eg. cycling, tennis, jogging, swimming) for three or more hours per week had a 61% lower risk of death from PCa compared to men who exercised vigorously for less than one hour per week.1 Multiple epidemiological studies have suggested that obesity is also associated with increased PCa mortality2 and may represent a key component of the hypothesised mechanisms underpinning the relationship between physical activity and PCa outcome. 

    Androgen deprivation therapy

    Patients with PCa, especially those on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), may experience many debilitating symptoms from treatment, including changes in body composition. Prospective evaluation of 79 men during initial androgen deprivation therapy from baseline to 12 months showed ADT increased weight (1.8% SE 0.5%) and fat mass (11.0% SE 1.7%) and decreased lean mass (3.8% SE 0.6%) in men with nonmetastatic Pca.3,4 The loss of lean mass and increase in fat mass associated with ADT has major implications for the functional independence and comorbid disease risk of patients living with PCa. Exercise may provide a reasonable strategy to counteract the many adverse symptoms of PCa disease and treatments such as ADT. Exercise programmes are efficacious in improving body composition, exercise capacity, physical function and quality of life in patients with Pca.5 Engaging patients in regular exercise is essential to improve patient outcomes post-prostate cancer diagnosis and optimise health during treatment.6

    Exercise programme

    The American Cancer Society and the Prostate Cancer Foundation recommend that all patients with PCa adopt a regular exercise programme consisting of aerobic and resistance exercise.7,8 Treating clinicians should play a role in directly advocating the benefits of exercise to men with PCa and leading referral to a formal exercise programme when indicated.5 Moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise is most often prescribed (55-100% maximum heart rate) while moderate to high intensity resistance exercise is recommended (60-80% 1 repetition maximum).9,10,11

    Several exercise interventions have shown many positive physiological benefits for patients living with PCa.12 A three-month aerobic and resistance exercise programme preserved appendicular lean mass in men receiving ADT when compared with a usual care group, who lost ≈ 0.6kg (adjusted between group difference of 0.4kg, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7). Furthermore, reductions were observed in fat mass (-1.4kg 95% CI -2.3 to 0.6), trunk fat mass (-0.9kg 95% CI -1.5kg to 0.2kg) and percentage fat (-1.3% 95% CI -1.7kg to 0.8) in the exercise group when compared with usual care (13). A three-armed randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing six months of both resistance training (n = 40) and aerobic training (n = 40) to usual care (n = 40) in men receiving radiotherapy for PCa, found that when compared to aerobic training, resistance training provided additional longer term benefits in reducing body fat percentage (-0.16% and -1.5% respectively when compared to usual care). In comparison, physical fitness was maintained over the entire study period in both the resistance training (0.14ml/kg/min [95% CI -0.9 to -1.2 units]) and in the aerobic training groups (0.04ml/kg/min [95% CI -0.98 to -1.1 units]). In contrast, patients receiving usual care experienced a significant decline in aerobic fitness over 24 weeks of -1.4ml/kg/min (95% CI -2.4 to -0.4) from a baseline fitness of 27.6ml/kg/min.11 Trials examining these outcomes are ongoing. 

    Metastatic bone disease

    The clinical course of metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer survivors is relatively long, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 30%.14,15 Bone is the main metastatic site in about 80% of patients with PCa.16 Patients with bone metastasis are at risk of muscle atrophy and increased likelihood of skeletal complications;17 however both aerobic and resistance exercise were shown to be safe and feasible in this population.10,13 No deaths attributable to exercise interventions are detailed across four trials prescribing both aerobic and resistance exercise training to patients with advanced PCa. 10, 11, 18, 19 Other serious adverse events (eg. myocardial infarction) are equivalent to control participants.5

    As in patients with primary PCa, exercise programmes for patients living with advanced PCa should be individually tailored with consideration of the individual’s physical capabilities and limitations.20 Patients with advanced PCa should be taught skills on monitoring exercise intensity eg. using the Borg scale, and correct technique for resistance exercises.10

    When disease burden is high, resistance programmes may select specific exercises based on the location of bone metastasis which ensure that affected regions are not targeted and mechanical force is minimised. Resistance exercise programmes adapted in this way have shown to be protective against muscle atrophy. A RCT involving a 12-week resistance programme for patients with advanced PCa resulted in favourable changes in whole body (3%) and appendicular (4%) lean mass in the exercise group when compared with the usual care group.19 This results in considerable benefits by ameliorating metabolic disorders through improved insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis.21 As evidence grows showing the important role exercise plays in moderating body composition in men with PCa, attention is increasingly turning to the identification of molecular mechanisms connecting body composition and PCa.

    The link between obesity and cancer

    In 2012, a population based study estimated that a high body mass index (BMI) and obesity were attributed to 3.6% of all new cancer cases worldwide.22 While there are substantial arguments against a direct relationship between overall PCa risk and obesity,23 men who are classified as obese are more likely to suffer from aggressive disease,24 inferring a relationship between advanced PCa and obesity. In two large cohorts of patients with PCa enrolled in the Cancer Prevention Study in the US, CPS-I and CPS-II, high BMI was associated with poor overall survival or increased cancer related mortality.25 Physical activity has been associated with a decreased likelihood of diagnosis of advanced, metastatic PCa.26

    Metabolic syndrome

    Metabolic syndrome is defined as low level systemic inflammation and a group of factors, such as central adiposity, hypogonadism and hypertension, which together pose a greater risk for cardiovascular disease. Metabolic syndrome is linked with more aggressive, advanced PCa.27 In-vitro PCa cell line studies have demonstrated a direct link between adipocytes and changes in tumour cell proliferation and differentiation patterns.28 Adipocytes, or fat cells, secrete adipokines, some of which are associated with PCa. Anti-proliferative properties have been demonstrated in PCa cell line studies using adiponectin.29 In similar cell line studies, leptin was shown to enhance proliferation and to promote angiogenesis.30 These effects have also been demonstrated in PCa patients with a link between aggressive PCa and leptin levels reported.31 Systemic inflammation is recognised as a risk factor in many disease states, including cancer. Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such TNFa are thought to have a role to play in cancer progression.32 Physical activity holds significant potential to reduce the risk of systemic inflammation and may play a role in improving quality of life.33

    Natural killer cells

    Exercise interventions in cancer survivors have demonstrated an increased immune response and an increase in natural killer cell numbers post physical activity. Natural killer cells are paramount to the body’s innate immune response and play a role in the detection and destruction of atypical cells present in the bloodstream. Decreased levels of natural killer cells have been correlated with an increased risk of cancer.34 Circulating tumour cells (CTCa) are tumour cells which are thought to have shed off of a primary tumour or metastatic lesions and entered the bloodstream before extravasating to distant sites.35 It has been postulated that the extravasation of CTCs is aided by a method known as platelet cloaking.36 Platelet cloaking is thought to occur when activated platelets surround or cloak tumour cells and prevent them from being detected by natural killer cells thus contributing to the metastatic spread.37 In-vitro models using ovarian cancer cell lines have established that platelets aggregate to tumour cells and provide a protective pro-survival environment, leading to the hypothesis that they aid tumour cell metastasis.38

    ExPeCT clinical trial

    With increasing evidence examining the benefits of physical activity in metastatic PCa patients, there is an emerging need for a comprehensive exercise intervention programme incorporating advanced patients. ExPeCT (exercise, prostate cancer and circulating tumour cells) is a multi-centre randomised clinical trial for men with metastatic PCa, funded by the World Cancer Research Foundation (Clinicaltrials.gov NLM Identifier: NCT02453139). Recruitment for ExPeCT is underway in five Irish sites in conjunction with the All-Ireland Co-operative Clinical Research Group (ICORG) and one UK site (St Guy’s Hospital, London). ExPeCT has a target accrual of 200 participants and once enrolled in the study, patients are randomised into an exercise or control group and followed for a total of six months. The exercise programme consists of three months supervised aerobic exercise, followed by a three month unsupervised home based regime. Aerobic exercise will be based on an increase in heart rate and a range of activities, such as walking and jogging, are utilised. Due to the presence of lower limb metastatic bone lesions in these participants, equipment such as upper limb ergometers are used to accommodate any discomfort caused by metastatic burden. Participants randomised to the control group continue their standard care. 

    All participants are followed at three time points; baseline (T0), three months (T3) and six months (T6) (see Figure 1). Whole blood, serum and plasma are analysed for a series of systemic inflammatory markers; CTC number and platelet cloaking. Results of participants with a BMI of > 25 will be compared to the results of participants with a BMI of < 25. The overall aim of the ExPeCT trial is to examine the relationship between PCa, exercise, obesity and systemic inflammation, and to improve the overall quality of life in men with advanced disease. 

    The ExPeCT trial lays the foundation for the forthcoming Movember Global Prostate Cancer, Exercise and Metabolic Health Initiative (GAP4) which aims to better understand PCa progression.34 This will be a large scale multi-centre exercise trial for men with advanced cancer looking at overall survival as an endpoint and with additional endpoints focused on the mechanisms of action of physical activity on the biology of advanced disease. 

    Men in the intervention group will be supported with personalised exercise regimes that are tailored to their specific needs and abilities. Patients will be recruited at many sites from different countries around the world including Ireland and, in a global collaborative effort, data and biological samples will be shared and studied across borders by leading scientists and clinicians. This global translational research initiative aims to better understand the biological mechanisms by which exercise effects PCa. 

     (click to enlarge)

    References
    1. Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Chan JM. Physical activity and survival after prostate cancer diagnosis in the health professionals follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):726-32
    2. Allott EH, Masko EM, Freedland SJ. Obesity and prostate cancer: weighing the evidence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(5):800-9
    3. Galvao DA, Spry N, Denham J, Taaffe DR, Cormie P, Joseph D, et al. A multicentre year-long randomised controlled trial of exercise training targeting physical functioning in men with prostate cancer previously treated with androgen suppression and radiation from TROG 03.04 RADAR. Eur Urol. 2014;65(5):856-64.
    4. Smith MR. Changes in fat and lean body mass during androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2004;63(4):742-5.
    5. Bourke L, Smith D, Steed L, Hooper R, Carter A, Catto J, et al. Exercise for Men with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015.
    6. Thune I, Smeland S. [Is physical activity important in treatment and rehabilitation of cancer patients?]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000;120(27):3302-4.
    7. Carroll P CM, Zietman AL, Rothaermel JM. . Report to the nation on prostate cancer: a guide for men and their families. Retrieved February 22nd 2016, from The Prostate Cancer Foundation Web site. Available from: http://www.prostatecancerfoundation.org/site/c.itIWK2OSG/b.1190693/k.632D/Patient_Guide_Contents.htm.
    8. Doyle C, Kushi LH, Byers T, Courneya KS, Demark-Wahnefried W, Grant B, et al. Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2006;56(6):323-53.
    9. Uth J, Hornstrup T, Schmidt JF, Christensen JF, Frandsen C, Christensen KB, et al. Football training improves lean body mass in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24 Suppl 1:105-12.
    10. Bourke L, Gilbert S, Hooper R, Steed LA, Joshi M, Catto JWF, et al. Lifestyle changes for improving disease-specific quality of life in sedentary men on long-term androgen-deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer: A randomised controlled trial. European Urology. 2014;65(5):865-72.
    11. Segal RJ, Reid RD, Courneya KS, Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Prud’Homme DG, et al. Randomized controlled trial of resistance or aerobic exercise in men receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27(3):344-51.
    12. Rajarajeswaran P, Vishnupriya R. Exercise in cancer. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2009;30(2):61-70.
    13. Cormie P, Galvao DA, Spry N, Joseph D, Chee R, Taaffe DR, et al. Can supervised exercise prevent treatment toxicity in patients with prostate cancer initiating androgen-deprivation therapy: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2015;115(2):256-66.
    14. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2010;60(5):277-300.
    15. Cheville AL, Girardi J, Clark MM, Rummans TA, Pittelkow T, Brown P, et al. Therapeutic exercise during outpatient radiation therapy for advanced cancer: Feasibility and impact on physical well-being. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(8):611-9.
    16. Tombal B, Lecouvet F. Modern Detection of Prostate Cancer’s Bone Metastasis: Is the Bone Scan Era Over? Adv Urol. 2012;2012:893193.
    17. Galvao DA, Taaffe DR, Cormie P, Spry N, Chambers SK, Peddle-McIntyre C, et al. Efficacy and safety of a modular multi-modal exercise program in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:517.
    18. Bourke L, Doll H, Crank H, Daley A, Rosario D, Saxton JM. Lifestyle intervention in men with advanced prostate cancer receiving androgen suppression therapy: A feasibility study. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2011;20(4):647-57.
    19. Cormie P, Newton RU, Spry N, Joseph D, Taaffe DR, Galvao DA. Safety and efficacy of resistance exercise in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 2013;16(4):328-35.
    20. 20. Bourke L, Homer KE, Thaha MA, Steed L, Rosario DJ, Robb KA, et al. Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013;9:CD010192.
    21. 21. Mavros Y, Kay S, Anderberg KA, Baker MK, Wang Y, Zhao R, et al. Changes in insulin resistance and HbA1c are related to exercise-mediated changes in body composition in older adults with type 2 diabetes: interim outcomes from the GREAT2DO trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(8):2372-9.
    22. 22. Arnold M, Pandeya N, Byrnes G, Renehan AG, Stevens GA, Ezzati M, et al. Global burden of cancer attributable to high body-mass index in 2012: a population-based study. The Lancet Oncology.16(1):36-46.
    23. 23. Freedland SJ, Aronson WJ. Examining the Relationship Between Obesity and Prostate Cancer. Reviews in Urology. 2004;6(2):73-81.
    24. 24. Parker AS, Thiel DD, Bergstralh E, Carlson RE, Rangel LJ, Joseph RW, et al. Obese men have more advanced and more aggressive prostate cancer at time of surgery than non-obese men after adjusting for screening PSA level and age: results from two independent nested case-control studies. Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases. 2013;16(4):352-6.
    25. 25. Rodriguez C, Patel AV, Calle EE, Jacobs EJ, Chao A, Thun MJ. Body mass index, height, and prostate cancer mortality in two large cohorts of adult men in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10(4):345-53.
    26. 26. Giovannucci EL, Liu Y, Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. A prospective study of physical activity and incident and fatal prostate cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(9):1005-10.
    27. 27. Morote J, Ropero J, Planas J, Bastaros JM, Delgado G, Placer J, et al. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of aggressive prostate cancer detection. BJU Int. 2013;111(7):1031-6.
    28. 28. Mistry T, Digby JE, Desai KM, Randeva HS. Obesity and prostate cancer: a role for adipokines. European urology. 2007;52(1):46-53.
    29. 29. Gao Q, Zheng J. Adiponectin-induced antitumor activity on prostatic cancers through inhibiting proliferation. Cell biochemistry and biophysics. 2014;70(1):461-5.
    30. 30. Alshaker H, Sacco K, Alfraidi A, Muhammad A, Winkler M, Pchejetski D. Leptin signalling, obesity and prostate cancer: molecular and clinical perspective on the old dilemma. Oncotarget. 2015;6(34):35556-63.
    31. 31. Lopez Fontana CM, Maselli ME, Perez Elizalde RF, Di Milta Monaco NA, Uvilla Recupero AL, Lopez Laur JD. Leptin increases prostate cancer aggressiveness. Journal of physiology and biochemistry. 2011;67(4):531-8.
    32. 32. Landskron G, De la Fuente M, Thuwajit P, Thuwajit C, Hermoso MA. Chronic inflammation and cytokines in the tumor microenvironment. Journal of immunology research. 2014;2014:149185.
    33. 33. Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nature reviews Immunology. 2011;11(9):607-15.
    34. 34. Langers I, Renoux VM, Thiry M, Delvenne P, Jacobs N. Natural killer cells: role in local tumor growth and metastasis. Biologics : targets & therapy. 2012;6:73-82.
    35. 35. Hu B, Rochefort H, Goldkorn A. Circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer. Cancers. 2013;5(4):1676-90.
    36. 36. Stegner D, Dutting S, Nieswandt B. Mechanistic explanation for platelet contribution to cancer metastasis. Thrombosis research. 2014;133 Suppl 2:S149-57.
    37. 37. Palumbo JS, Talmage KE, Massari JV, La Jeunesse CM, Flick MJ, Kombrinck KW, et al. Platelets and fibrin(ogen) increase metastatic potential by impeding natural killer cell-mediated elimination of tumor cells. Blood. 2005;105(1):178-85.
    38. 38. Egan K, Crowley D, Smyth P, O’Toole S, Spillane C, Martin C, et al. Platelet adhesion and degranulation induce pro-survival and pro-angiogenic signalling in ovarian cancer cells. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26125.
    39. 39. https://cdn.movember.com/uploads/files/Funded%20Programs/Movember_Foundation_GAP4_Info_Sheet.pdf. [22/02/2016]. Available from: https://cdn.movember.com/uploads/files/Funded%20Programs/Movember_Foundation_GAP4_Info_Sheet.pdf 
    © Medmedia Publications/Cancer Professional 2016