NUTRITION

Childhood obesity programming and the early protein hypothesis

Obesity rates in Ireland have increased dramatically over the past few decades, especially in childhood.

Ms Sarah Keogh, Dietitian, Eatwell Clinic, Dublin

April 14, 2016

Article
Similar articles
  • Obesity rates in Ireland have increased dramatically over the past few decades, especially in childhood. The National Children’s Survey in 2005 found that, depending on the method used to define obesity, 4.1 to 11% of boys were obese and 9.3 to 16.3% of girls.1 In 2011, the Growing Up in Ireland Study2 showed that 19% of nine-year-olds were overweight with 7% obese. Girls are more likely to be defined as overweight or obese than boys, with a total of 30% of girls and 22% of boys found to be overweight or obese.2 Depending on the definition used, there has been a two to four-fold increase in child obesity in Ireland since 1990.1

    Children who become overweight often go on to become overweight or obese adults.3,4,5 Obesity is not only an adverse condition in itself, but is a prelude to a number of diseases later in life including diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease.3 Treatment of overweight and obesity is notoriously difficult and often unsuccessful.6 For this reason, public health efforts to prevent obesity have received increased focus worldwide.6 There has been a particular focus on prevention of obesity in early childhood and infancy. 

    A meta-analysis of prospective observational studies following children from birth to two years found maternal overweight, high infant birthweight and rapid weight gain during the first 12 months of life to be strongly associated with childhood overweight7. Several other studies have found similar results8, 9, 10 and there is now an evidence-based consensus that obesity may be programmed prenatally and during early infancy3 and that intervention at this early age may help to prevent later obesity and overweight. However, research into intervention to prevent obesity during this key period is rare and shows mixed outcomes and there is insufficient evidence to identify the key areas to target3. This short review focuses on some of the research into the metabolic programming of obesity through rapid growth in the first two years of life.

    Programming

    Programming refers to the concept that an insult or stimulus applied at a critical or sensitive period may have long-term lifetime effects on the structure or function of an organism.11 Programming effects in animals have been seen in research since the 1960s.11 Nutrition in early life in animals has been shown to affect, in adulthood, blood lipids, blood pressure, body fatness, behaviour, learning and longevity.11 Programming studies in humans tend to be observational which creates difficulties in proving causation or to form the basis of clinical practice. Intervention studies on potential programming are limited but do suggest that, in particular, rapid postnatal growth in humans may increase later cardiovascular risk, insulin resistance and obesity.7, 12, 13, 14, 15

    Rapid early weight gain

    Rapid early weight gain has been consistently shown to be a risk factor for later obesity.4, 10, 16, 17, 18 In a meta-analysis, Druet et al17 showed that an increase of one SD in weight Z-score in the first year of life is associated with a two-fold risk of childhood obesity and a 23% higher risk of obesity in adulthood. Absolute weight gain in infants over six months is correlated with overweight at age four years and with BMI, fat mass and metabolic risk score at 17 years.19, 20 Studies suggest that the first few weeks and months of life are particularly associated with later weight status6. The effect of weight gain in the first three years of life also had a stronger impact on metabolic disturbances at 17 years than did weight gain between the ages of three and six years, suggesting that early infancy is a crucial window of metabolic programming.19 Rapid weight gain in the first two years is linked to a range of late-onset adverse outcomes including high blood pressure,21 increased body fat deposition,22 unfavourable lipoprotein profiles23 and diabetes.7

    What affects early growth?

    It has become well accepted that the preconception health of the mother as well as the in utero environment programs the infant metabolic profile including later obesity risk24. High birthweight and high weight gain in the first two years of life are associated with increased risk of later obesity.25 Both in utero and in early life, infants organ systems still maintain considerable plasticity for adaptation to nutritional and environmental exposures6 and may be influenced by feeding choices. However, the precise mechanisms driving the correlation between excess weight gain in the first six months of life and later obesity remains unknown.6

    Early protein hypothesis

    One possible mechanism of metabolic programming is represented by the ‘early protein hypothesis’. This hypothesis comes from the observation that, compared to breastfed infants, formula fed infants have greater body weight gains in infancy.26, 27,28,29,30 This difference in weight gain may be linked to differences in protein content and type between breast milk and formula milk. Protein per kilogram of body weight is 55-80% higher in formula milk than breast milk.31 It was proposed that a higher protein intake may stimulate secretion of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) which can lead to accelerated growth and increased adipose tissue 31, 32,33,34. A positive association between protein and early growth has been seen in some but not all studies35,36,37 however, this is an area of active research and there is a growing body of evidence that protein intakes in early infancy may impact later obesity. 

    In 2009, the European Childhood Obesity Program (CHOP) study31 carried out a multi-centre, double-blind intervention trial. A total of 636 infants were randomly assigned to receive infant and follow-on formulas with a lower or higher content of cows milk protein during the first year of life. Their growth pattern was compared with that of breast fed infants. They found that a higher protein content of infant formula was associated with higher growth. 

    Although weight was higher in the higher protein group, there were no significant differences in length, suggesting that the additional weight observed was due to a difference in body fat or a difference in adiposity. In a follow up study in the same cohort, Weber et al38 found that the children fed the higher protein infant formula had a significantly higher BMI at six years of age compared to the children who had received the lower protein formula. In general, studies of total energy, carbohydrate and fat intake in the first two years of life do not show the same later associations with obesity. 31,39

    The protein content of formula milks has traditionally been higher than that of breastmilk.40 Among other reasons, this is largely due to the lower digestibility of cow’s milk protein, limiting the supply of essential amino acids.40 Legislation also sets the minimum and maximum protein contents of formula milk. Growing evidence of the possible link between higher protein intakes in infancy and obesity has recently led to EFSA recommending a reduction in the permitted amount of protein in infant formula from 3.0g per 100kcal to 2.5g per 100kcal.33

    Although higher protein intakes in early life, from birth to two years are associated with increased weight gain and later obesity, there are many other factors which may play a role. Maternal increased BMI, smoking and circulating triglycerides are also associated with rapid postnatal growth and may represent a ‘double-hit’ in programming effects in their offspring.7 More research is needed into the factors that affect obesity programming and into the specific underlying mechanisms. Although evidence is gathering that higher protein intakes in the early years may be significant, there are no scientific data available as yet to establish a precise cut off value for the maximum protein content in formula milk.33

    Conclusion

    Obesity rates continue to climb with Ireland expected to have the highest obesity prevalence in Europe by 2030.41 Early intervention represents one area for prevention of obesity and intervention in infancy is easier because dietary intake is homogenous and many common childhood feeding issues have not yet manifested.6 The levels of protein supplied to infants both before and during complementary feeding may be a key factor in determining growth and future obesity, but there are many other factors that can affect both rapid growth in infants and future obesity risk.

    References
    1. O’Neill JL, McCarthy SN, Burke SJ, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Irish schools children using four different definitions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2007) 61, 743–751
    2. Layte R, McCrory C. Overweight and Obesity Among 9 year olds. Growing up in Ireland National Longitudinal Study of Children. Government Publications. 2011. ISBN 978-1-4064-2612-0. Available at: <http://www.growingup.ie/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Second_Child_Cohort_Reports/Growing_Up_in_Ireland_-_Overweight_and_Obesity_Among_9-Year-Olds.pdf>. Accessed 22 February 2016
    3. Brands B, Demmelmair H, Koletzko. How growth due to infant nutrition influences obesity and later disease risk. Acta Paediatrica. 2014;103:578-585
    4. Baird J, Fisher D, Lucas P, et al. Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity. Br Med J 2005;331:929
    5. Yu ZB, Han SP, Zhu GZ, et al. Birth weight and subsequent risk of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2011;12:525–42
    6. Young BE, Johnson SL, Krebs NF. Biological determinants linking infant weight gain and child obesity: current knowledge and future directions. Advances in Nutrition. 2012;3:675-686
    7. Weng SF, Redsell SA, Swift JA et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for childhood overweight identifiable during infancy. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:1019-26. Available at < http://adc.bmj.com/content/97/12/1019.full.pdf+html>. Accessed 20 February 2016
    8. Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics 1998;101(Suppl 2):518–25. 
    9. Hawkins SS, Cole TJ, Law C et al. An ecological systems approach to examing risk factors for early childhood overweight: finding from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63:147-55
    10. Rooney BL, Mathiason MA, Schauberger CW. Predictors of Obesity in Childhood, Adolescence, and Adulthood in a Birth Cohort. Matern Child Health Journal. 2010;7:7. 
    11. Lucas A. Long-term programming effects of early nutrition – implications for the preterm infant. Journal of Perinatology. 2005;25:S2-S6
    12. Wilson AC, Forsyth JS, Greene SA et al. Relation of infant diet to childhood health: seven year follow up of cohort of children in Dundee infant feeding study. BMJ. 1998;316:21-5
    13. Forsen T, Eriksson J, Tuomilehto J et al. The fetal and childhood growth of persons who develop type 2 diabets. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:176-82
    14. Dixon JB. The effect of obesity on health outcomes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 316:104–8. 
    15. Hardwick J, Sidnell A. Infant nutrition – diet between 6 and 24 months, implications for paediatric growth, overweight and obesity. Nutrition Bulletin. 2014;39:354-363.
    16. Ong KK, Loos RJ. Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent obesity: systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:904-8
    17. Druet C, Stettler N, Sharp S, Simmons RK et al. Predition of childhood obesity by infancy weight gain: an individual meta-analysis. Paedatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26:19-26
    18. Stettler N, Zemel BS, Kumanyika S, et al. Infant weight gain and childhood overweight status in a multicenter, cohort study. Pediatrics. 2002;109:194–9. 
    19. Ekelund U, Ong KK, Linne Y et al. Association of weight gain in infancy and early childhood with metabolic risk in young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:98-103
    20. Gillman MW. The first months of life: a critical period for development of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1587-9
    21. Bansal N, Ayoola OO, Gemmell I, et al. Effects of early growth on blood pressure of infants of British, European and South Asian origin at one year of age: the Manchester children’s growth and vascular health study. J Hypertens. 2008;26:412-8
    22. Stettler N. Nature and strength of epidemiological evidence for origins of childhood and adult obesity in the first year of life. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31:1035-43.
    23. Horta BL, Victora CG, Lima RC, Post P. Weight gain in childhood and blood lipids in adolescence. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:1024-8
    24. Barker DJ. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998;95:115-28.
    25. Koletzko B, von Kries R, Monasterolo RC, et al. Can infant feeding choices modulate later obesity risk? Am J Clinc Nutr. 2009;89:1502S-8S
    26. Dewey KG. Growth characteristics of breast fed compared to formula fed infants. Biol Neonate. 1998;74:94-105
    27. Kramer MS, Guo T, Platt, RW et al. Feeding effects on growth during infancy. J Paediatr. 2004;145:600-5
    28. Victora CG, Morris SS, Barros FC et al. Breast-feeding and growth in Brazilian infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:452-8
    29. Robinson SM, Marriott LD, Crozier SR et al. Variations in infant feeding practice are associated with body composition in childhood: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol Metab. 2009;94:2799-805
    30. Jing-Qiu Ma, Li-Li Zhou, Yan-Qi Hu, Shan Shan Liu, Xiao-Yang Sheng. Association between feeding practices and weight status in young children. BMC Paediatrics. 2015;15:97
    31. Koletzko B, von Kries R, Closa R, et al. Lower protein in infant formula is associated with lower weight up to age 2y: a randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009;89:1836-45
    32. Kalhan SC. Optimal protein intake in healthy infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009;89:1719-20
    33. EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies). Scientific opinion on the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae. EFSA Journal. 2014;12(7):3760, 106
    34. Michaelsen KF, Greer FR. Protein needs in early life. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2001;99(suppl):718S-22S
    35. Nielsen GA, Thomsen BL, Micahelson KF. Influence of breast-fedding and complementary food on growth between 5 and 10 months. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87:911-7. 
    36. Heinig MJ, Nommsen LA, Peerson JM et al. Intake and growth of breast fed and formula fed infants in realtion to the timing of introduction of complimentary foods: the DARLING study. Acta Paediatr 1993;82:999-1006
    37. Lonnerdal B, Hernell O. Effects of feeding ultr-high temperature (UHT)-treated infant formula with different protein concentrations or powdered formula as compared with breast feeding on plasma amino acids, haemotology and trace element status. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68:350-6
    38. Weber M, Grote V, Closa-Monasterolo R, Escribano J et al. Lower protein in infant formula reduces BMI and obesity risk at school age: follow up of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nut. 2014;99:1041-51
    39. Gunther AL, Buyken AE, Kroke A. Protein intake during the period of complementary feeding and early childhood and the association with body mass index and percentage body fat at 7 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:162-33
    40. Lonnerdal B. Infant formula and infant nutrition: bioactive proteins of human milk and implications for composition of infant formulas. AM J Clin Nutr. 2014;712S-717S.
    41. Webber L, Divajeval D, Marsh T, et al. The European obese model: the shape of things to come. European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Amsterdam. 2014.
    © Medmedia Publications/Professional Nutrition and Dietetic Review 2016